MobileBattleBunker wrote:
Is Chief qualified with Nato and Warsaw Pack arms?
I actually did take a foreign weapons familiarization course up at Aberdeen Proving Grounds back in the 90s before they closed it down. So you could say I'm "familiar" with a dozen or so (former) Warsaw Pact small arms, even though we didn't qualify by Army standards -- I am or have been a "qualified expert" on the M16A1, M16A2, M4, M249, M2 1911A1, .38 cal pistol, and M9, at one time or another over the last 19 years, though
But keep in mind that although the filecards added a small dose of realism to the mythos, most of the items listed on them was pure fantasy. You don't qualify on all NATO and Warsaw pact small arms (those are hundreds and hundreds of pieces of equipment), you also don't qualify Expert on the K-Bar, Crossbow, and Garrote

, females don't go to Ranger training and Warrant Officers aren't E-6s. I could go on, but my Carpal-tunnel Syndrome is acting up..... ( old "war" wound

)
If you want to compile a list, it'd be a pain in the ass. NATO countries are pretty well documented, so you can try to see which weapons are used by each country's military -- you'll notice Israel isn't a NATO country, so despite the over-abundance of UZIs used in Joe lore, the UZI doesn't count. And the only time I've ever seen any US soldiers with an UZI (I was one of them) was at the foreign weapon course.
Same with Warsaw Pact - basically every country that used to be behind the Iron Curtain was a member of it. Most weapons were Soviet-made, but each country had their own as well.
Stan, I hate you
