| JoeCustoms.com https://docs.joecustoms.com/forums/ |
|
| Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? https://docs.joecustoms.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=1617 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Grand Ole Phil [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 4:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
Gung-Ho has specialized as the blunt force of the Joes for 25 years making use of the most destructive modern infantry weapons. ![]() The old M79 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-79_grenade_launcher has been upgraded many times over as the M4/M2o3. It's a no brainer if you want your Gung-Ho to be a grenadier or rifleman. ![]() On the other hand to wield the modern M60E4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M60_machine_gun#M60E4_and_Mk_43_Mod_0.2F1 seems more iconic somehow given Gung-Ho's brutish image. The question is, what weapon is more iconic for Gung-Ho? |
|
| Author: | Lev [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
I'd say the modern one. Nice looking Gung-Ho. |
|
| Author: | Taliesin Crow [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 4:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
I agree with Lev, the modern one looks best IMO. |
|
| Author: | Grand Ole Phil [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
Which is modern the one I refer to as modern? Both weapons are modern, the M203 and the Mk43 Mod 0. You mean the M60E4/Mk 43Mod 0 right? |
|
| Author: | Lev [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 6:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
Yeah, the one you refer to as modern |
|
| Author: | roguetiger [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
I'd go with the blooper cause thats what his main figure usually came with. BUT when my nephew was in Iraq he carried the M-16/M203 along with the M243 SAW rifle so I don't see any reason for Gung-Ho not to carry both. |
|
| Author: | Viper [ Tue Aug 28, 2007 7:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
The M4/M203, the Ragin' Cajun's a grenade man in my eyes. |
|
| Author: | Midgarn [ Wed Aug 29, 2007 3:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
Except that the M4/M203 combo (which looks a heckuva lot like the M16/M203 combo) is LEatherneck's baliwick. I'd opt for the machine gun of those two choices, as it fits more with Gung-Ho's flag-waving, bullet-bandolier wearing, Rambo-esque version. |
|
| Author: | starviper [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
roguetiger wrote: ...when my nephew was in Iraq he carried the M-16/M203 along with the M243 SAW Whoa... who did he piss off?? |
|
| Author: | roguetiger [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
starviper wrote: roguetiger wrote: ...when my nephew was in Iraq he carried the M-16/M203 along with the M243 SAW Whoa... who did he piss off?? According to him thats what all Sgt's carried over there. He arrived there the second day of the war and got his promotion to Sgt the day he arrived. He's short and would have perferred a M-4/M203 and the Saw but he got what he was trained with. Plus the M243 had the large scope on it as well. |
|
| Author: | Stormavik [ Sat Sep 01, 2007 12:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gung-Ho: Pig or Blooper? |
In my opinion Gung Ho has to have something that fires grenades. It is just part of his character. The other reason that I am not partial to a MG for him is that the Joes already have several others that carry that burden for the team. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|