Darko wrote:
Blitzkrieg wrote:
Even with the exaggerated proportions, I'll take this style of artwork ANY day over the pencil sketch garbage (e.g., unrecognizable Joes) that comprised the last year or so of the G.I. Joe: America's Elite comic.
And last time I checked, it is fiction, not a medical textbook. Artists are given a certain amount of freedom (depending on the employer) to express/interpret the characters as they wish. If you don't like the artwork, then don't buy it. I stopped buying the GIJ:AE title to express my disapproval of the quality (or lack thereof) of the artwork (i.e., I am not spending my money to support this).
Blitzkrieg
Wait, did you draw this or something? Because I'm not seeing any other reason to get so defensive....
No, I did not draw the cover (or any pages inside). I wish I had that much talent.
I actually like the artwork. I will buy at least one copy of each comic, because I am interested in seeing the DTC figures that I purchased "brought to life" in a visual storytelling medium.
One of the reasons that I was so "defensive" is although I respect your right to be offended (if I can use that word) by the cover art, I do not appreciate if someone else expresses their views on behalf of a community without knowledge of how the community actually feels:
"...okay, seriously...it doesn't really help
us fight the whole "HURRR! TOY NERDS DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT WOMENZ!" stereotype if
we continue to be associated with things like *that*. "
Simply put, I do not like when someone else tells me what my opinion should be. I do not recall being upset by the artwork when I saw it, nor do I remember signing up to fight nerd persecution. With the great strides in "nerd-dom" being considered "cool" in recent years (partly because of the money that can be made in that arena, see SDCC), I have become quite comfortable with that label and everything surrounding it, even if it is not all accurate/applicable.
Blitzkrieg