Would you like to have a Miles Mayhem figure?

Kilcarr · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:15 pm

Since we are getting a Matt Trakker what would your thoughts be on getting a Miles Mayhem?

Keenan · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:28 pm

Hell, yes! :-D

pluv · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:30 pm

Miles makes a hell of a lot more sense then Matt Tracker does. Mayem was the leader of a terrorist organization called Venom. His back story could easily be intertwined with that of Cobra's. You'd have an engineer type Cobra agent capable of leading troops. He could even be more like a fringe agent like Zartan with the rest of Venom falling under his command.

chaosx · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:32 pm

I like Pluv's idea...

Kilcarr · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:34 pm

chaosx wrote:

I like Pluv

Who doesn't?!

ronin · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am **Location:** NJ

No! One MASK figure is enough. If the guys at Hasbro are even remotely thinking of doing this, I kindly ask them to revisit a separate line of MASK figures SEPARATE from Joe.

prozac · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am

JFAK075 wrote:

Hell, yes! :-D

Greyryder · **Joined:** Sun May 25, 2008 9:59 pm

No. As funny as I find it when Hasbro puts Gobots characters into the Transformers line, Mask characters in GI Joe just annoys me, for some reason. It needs to be a seperate line, if they're going to make those characters.

Macrossmaster · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am

ronin wrote:

No! One MASK figure is enough. If the guys at Hasbro are even remotely thinking of doing this, I kindly ask them to revisit a separate line of MASK figures SEPARATE from Joe.

You know why they can't do this right? They can't get the rights to MASK as a term, only "Mobile Armored Strike Kommand", so thats why its referenced as such. As of now, they only way to get ANY Mask toys is through G.I. Joe, because a TRUE Mask toyline would have to be called something else, and NOT reference the original name MASK.

Chuckles · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:16 pm

Yeah! Use that SDCC CC/Toth body.

viperlord · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:16 pm

More than life itself.

As many MASK figures as they can give us.

Devilfish · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:21 pm

Only if he comes with a joe sized Switchblade. Now that would be sweet.

Mysterious Stranger · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:27 pm

Macrossmaster wrote:

ronin wrote:

No! One MASK figure is enough. If the guys at Hasbro are even remotely thinking of doing this, I kindly ask them to revisit a separate line of MASK figures SEPARATE from Joe.

You know why they can't do this right? They can't get the rights to MASK as a term, only "Mobile Armored Strike Kommand", so thats why its referenced as such. As of now, they only way to get ANY Mask toys is through G.I. Joe, because a TRUE Mask toyline would have to be called something else, and NOT reference the original name MASK.

Not entirely true. The packaging shown at SDCC clearly had the M.A.S.K. logo on the upper corner of the card where the 25th/cartoon/comic logos are now. I doubt they would show the packaged figure with a logo referencing a term they can't use at a big show like SDCC. If it had leaked that way I can understand but they showed it and made no mention of any rights issues with it. At least that's how I interpret the situation. I was too busy oogling Seth Green oogle the Matt Tracker figure to bring it up when I was there.

viperlord · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:29 pm

Mysterious Stranger wrote:

Macrossmaster wrote:

ronin wrote:

No! One MASK figure is enough. If the guys at Hasbro are even remotely thinking of doing this, I kindly ask them to revisit a separate line of MASK figures SEPARATE from Joe.

You know why they can't do this right? They can't get the rights to MASK as a term, only "Mobile Armored Strike Kommand", so thats why its referenced as such. As of now, they only way to get ANY Mask toys is through G.I. Joe, because a TRUE Mask toyline would have to be called something else, and NOT reference the original name MASK.

Not entirely true. The packaging shown at SDCC clearly had the M.A.S.K. logo on the upper corner of the card where the 25th/cartoon/comic logos are now. I doubt they would show the packaged figure with a logo referencing a term they can't use at a big show like SDCC. If it had leaked that way I can understand but they showed it and made no mention of any rights issues with it. At least that's how I interpret the situation. I was too busy oogling Seth Green oogle the Matt Tracker figure to bring it up when I was there.

That MASK logo litterally had the words "Mobile Armored Strike Kommand" written in it.

MASK as a trademark is a no go.

Mysterious Stranger · **Posted:** Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:30 pm

viperlord wrote:

Mysterious Stranger wrote:

Macrossmaster wrote:

You know why they can't do this right? They can't get the rights to MASK as a term, only "Mobile Armored Strike Kommand", so thats why its referenced as such. As of now, they only way to get ANY Mask toys is through G.I. Joe, because a TRUE Mask toyline would have to be called something else, and NOT reference the original name MASK.

Not entirely true. The packaging shown at SDCC clearly had the M.A.S.K. logo on the upper corner of the card where the 25th/cartoon/comic logos are now. I doubt they would show the packaged figure with a logo referencing a term they can't use at a big show like SDCC. If it had leaked that way I can understand but they showed it and made no mention of any rights issues with it. At least that's how I interpret the situation. I was too busy oogling Seth Green oogle the Matt Tracker figure to bring it up when I was there.

That MASK logo litterally had the words "Mobile Armored Strike Kommand" written in it.

MASK as a trademark is a no go.

I stand corrected. As I said I was too busy drooling with Seth Green to look close.

Would you like to have a Miles Mayhem figure?

Who is online