Scarrviper wrote:
You won't find figures in the ARAH run that can't sit down properly or can't bend their elbows a full 90 degrees.
No, but you'll find 13 that couldn't swivel their arms at first.
Quote:
They were lazy with the 25th line. "They were learning as they went" is no excuse for not making sure joints actually functioned.
They DID function. Maybe not to the extent that everyone would have liked, but they did function. Like I said, they were learning as they went. They eventually got it right, it just took time which is true for EVERYTHING. YOU couldn't walk when you were first "created". Does that mean that baby you was made "lazy"? Cars used to need a crank to start them. Does that mean they were made "lazy"? TVs used to only show a B&W picture. Were they made "lazy" too? It's called growing pains. Were those first figures as good as they could have been? Of course not. Go look at the first wave of ANY new style of product on the market and you'll find the same kind of problems. It doesn't mean it was a "lazy" design or anything of that sort. I suppose you think Pong was a "lazy" design too.

Quote:
They were also lazy in how many times they reused the same crappy molds.
THEY DO THAT NOW. Look at how many figures use either v54 Snake Eyes or Shock Trooper as a starting point. They've done this since DAY ONE IN 1982. They will always do that. It's how they recoup some of their tooling costs. It's not being "lazy". It's smart business.

danielb wrote:
if i recall correctly suicide arms where blamed on the chinese.... so much blame...
That happens all the time with ALL their lines. I'm quite sure Mattel has the exact same problems too.