Well, I got my monthly Westfield Comics box over the weekend, and it included G.I.JOE #0. So in response to jaramiller's thoughts on IDW's G.I.JOE #0, here are GITrekker's thoughts on G.I.Joe #0.
Two things leap out at me right off the bat, one of which I knew about.
#1 - It's a whole new continuity. One might assume that it's at least going to be reasonably similar to what we have come to expect, but the "Reset" button has definitely been hit. And for all the respect I have for people like Larry Hama and Chuck Dixon, this bothers me.
My gripe against reboots, reworkings, reimaginings, is hardly confined to G.I.Joe. I don't like Marvel's "Ultimate" universe, I don't like the modern Battlestar Galactica, I don't like what Tim Burton did to Planet of the Apes, and I think I already expressed my opinion about the forthcoming Star Trek movie in here someplace.
My bottom line has to be -- IF IT AIN'T BROKE, DON'T FIX IT. And while there are those that would argue that DDP slipped and stumbled with G.I.Joe more than needed, I will disagree that it is necessary to scrap everything from the past 26 years and start a whole new canvas. Regardless of how well the stories may well be, it bothers me.
#2 - Among the character designs in the back is an illustration of Roadblock. The character is clearly Roadblock. The design is even stated to be based on "v2". The character description and his capabilities are clearly those of Roadblock. And yet the name over all of this? HEAVY DUTY!
Look, I really have no problem with Heavy Duty as a character. BUT HE IS NO REPLACEMENT FOR ROADBLOCK. And I'm finding this switchover to be annoying in the extreme, and wondering a bit whose idea it really was.
Will I be reading IDW's G.I.Joe titles? I don't know. I do read some of their other work. I have found a reasonable percentage of their efforts on Transformers to be enjoyable, even if, there as well, I didn't see the need to reboot the G1-based tales the way they did, although in fairness, the continuity in Transformers is not quite as "set" as G.I.Joe, in my opinion.
I have also been generally VERY pleased with IDW's efforts on Star Trek. Given my opinion of Star Trek's cinematic future, it's nice to see that the REAL Star Trek continues somewhere, although I might wish that IDW would do more than sticking largely to the Classic Series with occasional appearances by Next Gen. There's three other Treks out there that I wouldn't mind hearing from again.
But G.I.Joe? We'll see... Right now, I'm just not sure.
