Stone wrote:
Tim 121RVC wrote:
I like bombers better than fighters, so the Rattler wins.
Except, the Rattler isn't a bomber.
This seems to keep going around about not understanding the dif between types of planes. Usually, they are designated to make it clear.
F = figther
B = bomber
C = cargo
A = attack (close air support for ground troops)
R = reconaisance
P = pursuit
..and a few more
Some additional effort is needed to understand the Fighter designation because it can be used for both air superiority fighters like the F-15, F-22 and also for tactical fighters that primarily attack ground targets like the F-16, F-117 and F-35. Although each has a primary purpose, pretty much all fighters can attack both air and ground targets.
snipOther designators are O - Observation
X- Expirimental
T- training
K- inflight refueling tanker
You're forgetting to mention that dual purpose air craft are designated as dual purpose. They have both designators. The F/A-18 Super Hornet and E/F-111 Raven are examples. Then you can get really into it when you start talking aircraft that have been repurposed, for instance the E/A-6B Prowler and K/A-6d tanker, both of which are repurposed A-6 Intruders, the O/A-10 Forward Air Control, or everybody's favorite, the A/C-130 Spectre.
Greyryder wrote:
Attack planes are light bombers. The A-10 carries more bombs than a B-17. The F-117 is likewise a light bomber, that should, by all rights, have an A designation. The Nighthawk doesn't even have air to air capabilities. It has no gun, and cannot carry anti-aircraft missiles.
Also, the F-16 Falcon is an air superiority fighter, that had ground attack capabilities added on to it, much like a scene from the HBO movie "The Pentagon Wars."
Also, you have to understand that all of these designators are having less and less meaning as the modern military is trying to cram as much "Multi-role" into the arsenal as they possibly can.
Oh, and so I'm not completely OT, I myself prefer the Rattler, mainly because of the colors.