Rules    FAQ
User: Guest ( Register )
 
 
 

It is currently Fri Feb 13, 2026 8:05 pm (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Hurricane is Better than the Rattler....Prove me wrong
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:44 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Ohio
Tim 121RVC wrote:
I like bombers better than fighters, so the Rattler wins.


Except, the Rattler isn't a bomber.
This seems to keep going around about not understanding the dif between types of planes. Usually, they are designated to make it clear.

F = figther
B = bomber
C = cargo
A = attack (close air support for ground troops)
R = reconaisance
P = pursuit
..and a few more

Some additional effort is needed to understand the Fighter designation because it can be used for both air superiority fighters like the F-15, F-22 and also for tactical fighters that primarily attack ground targets like the F-16, F-117 and F-35. Although each has a primary purpose, pretty much all fighters can attack both air and ground targets.

Anyway, back to the topic of Hurricane vs Rattler.
The Rattler is based off the A-10, but has been changed to add some air-to-air capability too. The Hurricane is armed with all air-to-ground, but seems more like a tactical fighter like the F-117 exclusively for hitting ground targets. This is a lot like the Firebat too which I'd call a tactical fighter as well for hitting ground targets.

Which one is better (at hitting ground targets)?
I'd go with Hurricane, because I'd assume it's faster and also has more guided missiles for precision attack. The unmanned drone also gives the Hurricane an edge because it can go in to take out a SAM site without putting the pilot or the main aircraft at any risk.

_________________
Stone

“The observer, when he seems to himself to be observing a stone, is really, if physics is to be believed, observing the effects of the stone upon himself.”
~Bertrand Russell


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hurricane is Better than the Rattler....Prove me wrong
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:19 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 9:59 pm
Attack planes are light bombers. The A-10 carries more bombs than a B-17. The F-117 is likewise a light bomber, that should, by all rights, have an A designation. The Nighthawk doesn't even have air to air capabilities. It has no gun, and cannot carry anti-aircraft missiles.

_________________
Greytech Heavy Industries

If it ain't broke, take it apart and lose some of the pieces. Then, it'll be a custom.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hurricane is Better than the Rattler....Prove me wrong
PostPosted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:08 pm 
User avatar
The Thread Assassin.

Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Savannah, Ga
Stone wrote:
Tim 121RVC wrote:
I like bombers better than fighters, so the Rattler wins.


Except, the Rattler isn't a bomber.
This seems to keep going around about not understanding the dif between types of planes. Usually, they are designated to make it clear.

F = figther
B = bomber
C = cargo
A = attack (close air support for ground troops)
R = reconaisance
P = pursuit
..and a few more

Some additional effort is needed to understand the Fighter designation because it can be used for both air superiority fighters like the F-15, F-22 and also for tactical fighters that primarily attack ground targets like the F-16, F-117 and F-35. Although each has a primary purpose, pretty much all fighters can attack both air and ground targets.

snip


Other designators are O - Observation
X- Expirimental
T- training
K- inflight refueling tanker
You're forgetting to mention that dual purpose air craft are designated as dual purpose. They have both designators. The F/A-18 Super Hornet and E/F-111 Raven are examples. Then you can get really into it when you start talking aircraft that have been repurposed, for instance the E/A-6B Prowler and K/A-6d tanker, both of which are repurposed A-6 Intruders, the O/A-10 Forward Air Control, or everybody's favorite, the A/C-130 Spectre.

Greyryder wrote:
Attack planes are light bombers. The A-10 carries more bombs than a B-17. The F-117 is likewise a light bomber, that should, by all rights, have an A designation. The Nighthawk doesn't even have air to air capabilities. It has no gun, and cannot carry anti-aircraft missiles.


Also, the F-16 Falcon is an air superiority fighter, that had ground attack capabilities added on to it, much like a scene from the HBO movie "The Pentagon Wars."

Also, you have to understand that all of these designators are having less and less meaning as the modern military is trying to cram as much "Multi-role" into the arsenal as they possibly can.

Oh, and so I'm not completely OT, I myself prefer the Rattler, mainly because of the colors.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hurricane is Better than the Rattler....Prove me wrong
PostPosted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:28 pm 
User avatar
card back fetish
card back fetish

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: the Morg, CO US of A
nova wrote:
Dream wrote:
Night Reven is supeior to all other Cobra Aircraft. It holds 3 figures, has a detatchable drone, working cockpit lift and hinged engin covers.

Does the Huricane have any of these things or the snazy black paint job? I think not.



Hurricane Holds 2 figures in the Cockpit Equal to the Raven. Hurricane has a Detachable drone with a Spring Loaded Missile launcher, A canopy that isn't prone to breaking or falling appart when used, and has a removable engine panel.


The Hurricane would have been a much more "little dream" friendly plane... You're spindley little kid arms could have flown the Hurricane around and shot down Joes by the dozen....instead you had the Raven...prolly had to strap it on your back like a book-bag and run around bent over at the waist just to pretend it was flying.


Actually the only Cobra Aircraft I had as a kid was the F.A.N.G.II. :-/

That being said, you have a very good point about the size for kids and I'll agree with you on this one. The Huricane is probably better for playablility when it comes to kids. But for me it would really only win in that catagory.

BTW, I still have spindley little kid arms :shifty:

_________________
Check out my new website, http://troymckie.com

Come see the "What I'm Working On" posts every Thursday.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

It is currently Fri Feb 13, 2026 8:05 pm (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 315 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group